Corgi, an open-source terminal multiplexer that tracks coding agents like Claude Code and Codex, launches on Show HN
Corgi is presented as an open-source terminal multiplexer that tracks coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and OpenCode. The page describes a dashboard showing each agent's status (working, needs you, finished, idle), activity tracking, background sessions that keep running like tmux, a replay of files touched, worktree management, workspace organization, and live per-workspace resource usage. It also mentions pasting images over SSH and clickable links.
One primary source; other links are context, not independent corroboration.
- Primary sourceHacker News discovery · concern recorded
- Discovery linkHacker News
Grok Bot submitted the link. AINewsIQ fetched the primary source and prepared a source-based brief automatically. An editor has not reviewed the story; social attention and the brief do not independently verify its claims.
Open full article view →- Original repository+40
- Fetched source page+30
- No editor link review+0
- Original non-discussion link+5
This measures the stored source trail and editorial steps. It does not certify accuracy, peer review, or independent corroboration. Popularity adds no points.
View full scoring →Read the scoring rubric →What the source says
Corgi is presented as an open-source terminal multiplexer that tracks coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Pi, and OpenCode. The page describes a dashboard showing each agent's status (working, needs you, finished, idle), activity tracking, background sessions that keep running like tmux, a replay of files touched, worktree management, workspace organization, and live per-workspace resource usage. It also mentions pasting images over SSH and clickable links.
Key findings from the stored brief
- Shows each coding agent's status, including working, needs you, finished, and idle.
- Keeps agents and processes running in the background, similar to tmux.
- Provides activity tracking and a replay of every file an agent touched.
- Shows live resource usage per workspace and supports worktree management.
Source claims not independently checked; the page is a product landing page and feature claims are self-reported.
This is a source-based abstract, not independent validation of the source's claims.
Evidence & sources
These links show where the signal came from and what the source page linked to. A linked page is context, not independent corroboration.
Grok Bot submitted the link. AINewsIQ fetched the primary source and prepared a source-based brief automatically. An editor has not reviewed the story; social attention and the brief do not independently verify its claims.
Timeline & updates
- Signal dated by source or discovery feed
This timestamp places the signal in the radar. It may be the discovery post date rather than the primary page's first publication date.
- Shared brief stored
AINewsIQ prepared one abstract from fetched source page.
A publication revision history is not stored for this signal. New engagement snapshots do not mean the source itself changed.
Why this may matter
Developers running several coding agents at once face tracking and token-cost visibility problems. A terminal tool that centralizes agent status and usage could make parallel agent workflows easier to monitor.
Limits and open questions
Source claims not independently checked; the page is a product landing page and feature claims are self-reported.
Organization-specific financial, security, and operational effects require the organization's own context and review.
Discussion
Ask about the source, add context, or point readers to a relevant follow-up.
Discussion
Comments are reviewed before publication. Discuss the evidence, not the person.
No published comments yet.
Reader discussion opens with accounts. You can read the original source and published comments now.