GPT-6.1 Terra (Max) Scores 48 on Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis lists GPT-6.1 Terra (Max), a proprietary reasoning model released October 2026, scoring 48 on its Intelligence Index, versus a median of 28 among comparable models. The page reports 130M output tokens generated on the index (median 81M), input/output pricing of $1.00 and $5.00 per 1M tokens, about $0.40 per index task, and 90.9 output tokens per second. The model accepts text and image input, outputs text, and has a 1M-token context window.
Open original source artificialanalysis.aiOne primary source; other links are context, not independent corroboration.
- Primary sourceHacker News · AI
- Discovery linkHacker News
A community post points to the original link. Discussion and upvotes do not establish accuracy.
- Community discussion+5
- Fetched source page+30
- No editor link review0
- Community link0
This measures the stored source trail and editorial steps. It does not certify accuracy, peer review, or independent corroboration. Popularity adds no points.
View full scoring →Read the scoring rubric →What the source says
Artificial Analysis lists GPT-6.1 Terra (Max), a proprietary reasoning model released October 2026, scoring 48 on its Intelligence Index, versus a median of 28 among comparable models. The page reports 130M output tokens generated on the index (median 81M), input/output pricing of $1.00 and $5.00 per 1M tokens, about $0.40 per index task, and 90.9 output tokens per second. The model accepts text and image input, outputs text, and has a 1M-token context window.
A READER'S EVIDENCE CHECKHow to read this signalSix questions about claims, sources, risks, and open checks
This is a signal-level guide until claim-level evidence is available. “Not recorded” means the evidence has not been assessed here; it does not mean a result is false. How we check AI news →
- 01Who is making each claim?
The claimant and whether each claim was measured or asserted are not recorded in this public brief.
- 02What was actually tested?
Not recorded per claim. Check the source for sample size, tasks, model and benchmark versions, and reproducibility.
- 03Where are the sources?
Original link: artificialanalysis.ai. Brief basis: fetched source page. Primary page date and quote locations are not established in this panel.
- 04What could mislead?
Source claims not independently checked; scores reflect Artificial Analysis's own evaluation methodology and index version v4.3.2.
- 05What is at risk if wrong?
Not assessed per claim. Consider safety, privacy, cost, and adoption decisions before relying on the result.
- 06What would change the view?
No claim-specific check is recorded. An inspectable primary method or independent replication could change the assessment.
Key findings from the stored brief
- Scores 48 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, compared with a median of 28 for comparable models.
- Generated 130M output tokens on the Intelligence Index, versus a median of 81M, which the page describes as somewhat verbose.
- Priced at $1.00 per 1M input tokens and $5.00 per 1M output tokens, with about $0.40 per Intelligence Index task.
- Runs at 90.9 output tokens per second, which the page describes as faster than the average of 83.
Source claims not independently checked; scores reflect Artificial Analysis's own evaluation methodology and index version v4.3.2.
This is a source-based abstract, not independent validation of the source's claims.
Evidence & sources
These links show where the signal came from and what the source page linked to. A linked page is context, not independent corroboration.
Related archive coverage
These relationships record a citation or topic overlap, not confirmation of the finding.
A community post points to the original link. Discussion and upvotes do not establish accuracy.
Timeline & updates
- Signal dated by source or discovery feed
This timestamp places the signal in the radar. It may be the discovery post date rather than the primary page's first publication date.
- Shared brief stored
AINewsIQ prepared one abstract from fetched source page.
A publication revision history is not stored for this signal. New engagement snapshots do not mean the source itself changed.
Why this may matter
Independent benchmark pages give a comparative view of a frontier model's capability, speed, and cost against peers, which informs model selection decisions beyond vendor claims.
Limits and open questions
Source claims not independently checked; scores reflect Artificial Analysis's own evaluation methodology and index version v4.3.2.
Organization-specific financial, security, and operational effects require the organization's own context and review.
Discussion
Comments are reviewed before publication. Discuss the evidence, not the person.
No published comments yet.
Reader discussion opens with accounts. You can read the original source and published comments now.